View Our Work

A short history of 3D, or not 3D

20 December 2011

Should your designers be using marker pens, or CAD? Does CAD restrict creativity or enhance it?

Austen Miller, Senior Partner, 3form Design 

I was writing new material shaders for Pixar Renderman in the days before any of us had even mentioned TOY STORY.

Unfortunately, in those early days computers were so slow that you would get up in the middle of the night just to see how the rendering was going. Even if the computer didn’t find a syntax error there were no printers or fancy file exchanges; we just took pictures of the screen, and I am not talking digital cameras.

While the technology was not quite there, I picked up my marker pens and practised the art of mixed media rendering. The understanding of light and shape was the same for both and this had its own advantages. The difference being that where as a programmer I would study it once and capture it in code, as an artist I had to repeat the process every time.

But while Buzz Lightyear was learning to fly, technology was moving fast and I was finally using the medium to design products.

CAD was already accepted in the engineering departments and when it came to converting to 2D engineering drawings the pen plotter was a formidable machine. The problem was that the process began with designer sketches and mock up models all done in traditional manual lay ups. This bought about a new stage in the CAD revolution, reverse engineering. In order to benefit from the faster more accurate downstream processes the information had to be input into the computers. This is where the cynics of technology won points. The conversion added time to projects and there was often a loss of design intent during translation.

But I wasn’t from art college. I had no honour to defend and I had been practising using digital technology artistically for some time. I offered a process without reverse engineering. The process begins with what I termed “3D Sketching”; creating and exploring form in digital 3D. Not only does it do away with reverse engineering but also offers real advantages in the early stages of conceptual studies. As well as holding on to the real life constraints of size and scale we can explore shape, colour and texture extremely rapidly. The client portfolio grew fast.

Strangely, there are still many design companies (and I mean many) that although use CAD as a design tool still begin the process with 2D sketches. It is not for everyone to be able to envision and work in 3D but considering what the final result is meant to be, you would think it would be a pre-requisite.

Even now, that I have proven the success of my design philosophy I am still challenged for debate. The prejudice reminds me of how air-brushing was once deemed not worthy of being called art, and in some quarters still isn’t. Creativity should not be measured by the medium we choose but how successful we can be with it.

Post To Facebook Twitter Google Plus LinkedIn
Back to Blog

Continue Reading

Further Reading

Article Series

Six Steps To CE Mark Your Medical Product

24 October 2018

From the laptop you use at work to the pint glass down the pub, most of the products we surround ourselves with are marked with a “CE”. Look at…

Read More
Article Series

Brexit, EU Regulation, and UK Innovation

10 October 2018

For those looking to bring a medical device to market in the EU, relying on past experience and strategy will no longer make the cut. With the added uncertainty…

Read More

Wanted - Product Design Engineer

24 September 2018

We’re seeking two strong product design engineers to help challenge the status quo and manipulate the rules to create the game-changing products that…

Read More